| StockFetcher Forums · View by Author: (558 messages) [ Display By: Date / Subject ] | << 1 2 3 4 5 ... 56 >> |
 | |
| General Discussion · Does this drawing offer value to anyone | |
| nibor100 msg #154117 |
9/23/2020 10:52:29 AM @styliten, Thanks for taking the time to give me a thorough reply! 1.The answer to your first question for me, is Yes as I use the following visually: a. Where the 3 period moving avg is related to the 13 period moving avg. b. The direction each moving avg is moving and has moved in the past, I usually look at 3months, 6months, 1yr and 2yr charts on SF if a particular stock piques my interest. c. Where the candlesticks are in relating to the 3 period moving avg. d.but I do my main selecting of stocks using SF filters to find stocks where the 3 is above the 13, price is above the 3, the 3 has been rising etc. so I don't have to look at many charts at all.. 2. The answer to your 2nd question is Yes to some degree as it seems to focus the eyes immediately on crossover points; but I generally don't have a problem spotting them on a regular chart. a. I do wonder why you use a period of 5 for all of your loop line calculations whether you are using CLRI, TSF or CMA. Is it because it visually looks better or some other reason? Perhaps its because 8 is halfway between 3 and 13 by a count of 5 in either direction? Ed S. |
| General Discussion · Does this drawing offer value to anyone | |
| nibor100 msg #154104 |
9/21/2020 4:49:17 PM @styliten I used your suggested symlist(AVEO, FLDM, RVP, SRGA, VXRT, EVFM, SONO, GNUS, TOPS) on your modified 1st filter to see if I could understand how to use it with size and shape being the only criteria that matter and in the 20 day period that your filter uses I did not have much success figuring it out. a. I also checked for when your lines most recently crossed vs when the Close price crossed above the your 3 moving avg lines and found: 2 stocks had cross 1 day before close crossed 2 stocks had cross same day as close cross 2 stocks had cross 2 days after close cross 2 stocks had cross 1 day after close cross and 1 stock had no cross in the 20 day period b. I then checked for how many days before the lines crossed that the line crossing upward had continued moving upward after its latest bottoming point, considering that might be an early entry point. 2 stocks 5 days before lines crossed 1 stock 4 days before 1 stock 3 days before 2 stocks 2 days before 2 stocks 1 day before and still 1 stock with no cross :) c. Please clue me in if I am overlooking something obvious method for intrepreting those lines. Thanks, Ed S. |
| Filter Exchange · varoffset() | |
| nibor100 msg #154102 |
9/21/2020 3:36:01 PM Excellent use of VarOffset! When you add a Stop you might want to consider incorporating some of Cegis filter ideas regarding a trading system with stop prices and exits updated daily. ( though of course bound by SF complexity rules) Thanks, Ed S. |
| General Discussion · Does this drawing offer value to anyone | |
| nibor100 msg #154082 |
9/20/2020 10:38:18 PM @Graf, I don't remember the specific post, does the filter below have what you are looking for, the VarOffset function? By the way, when we drag the SF chart displays 1 day at a time to the right, we can see the values for each indicator shown on the right axis for that prior day. Ed S. |
| General Discussion · Does this drawing offer value to anyone | |
| nibor100 msg #154077 |
9/20/2020 1:05:12 PM @xarlor, Did you mean for your trigger to count both long and short crossovers in the results? Also, you probably don't need the zerobar plottype commands for your long and short displays. Thanks, Ed S. |
| General Discussion · Does this drawing offer value to anyone | |
| nibor100 msg #154076 |
9/20/2020 12:59:43 PM @graftonian, I believe CLRI() is just a custom linear regression of whatever other SF indicator is first in the parentheses which in this filter's case are moving averages not RSI. Hope this helps, Ed S. |
| Filter Exchange · Full Time Fram Continuity | |
| nibor100 msg #154055 |
9/18/2020 1:35:18 AM New to me in his FTFC filter is his usage of the Draw command to actually filter results! I knew we could filter results with the Add Column command.... for example: versus Seems like it might cut down the use of SET statements thereby reducing some filters complexities keeping them in the basic subscription domain. Ed S. |
| Filter Exchange · Full Time Fram Continuity | |
| nibor100 msg #154047 |
9/17/2020 11:46:22 AM @Cheese, Thanks for the explanation, and I wasn't disapointed as I found your approach interesting. Below are a couple of tweaks, mostly the standard Guppy's, to both, his FTFC filter and your comparing filter: Thanks, Ed S. |
| Filter Exchange · Full Time Fram Continuity | |
| nibor100 msg #154043 |
9/16/2020 8:12:01 PM @Cheese, 1. I'm curious how you are determining "advantage" of a filter related to Guppy's/multiple Mavgs? Do you have a Guppy filter that you are using that specifically filters out candidate stocks for trading based on some Guppy moving average recent activity such as crossovers or spacing, or compression etc.? if so please post the filter so we can compare "advantage" for ourselves. 2. I think he is day trading stocks returned by his FTFC filter for quick scalps primarily based on his var2/weekly criteria being false yesterday and true today while all other filter variables are true today. Thank, Ed S. |
| General Discussion · John Carter - Squeeze | |
| nibor100 msg #154040 |
9/16/2020 1:23:46 PM Sure there is, per pages 8 and 9 of the SF manual, add the phrase "for the last 4 days" to both of these lines: upper bollinger(20,2.0) below the Upper Keltner Band(20,1.5) lower bollinger(20,2.0) above the Lower Keltner Band(20,1.5) Ed S. |
| StockFetcher Forums · · | << 1 2 3 4 5 ... 56 >> |