StockFetcher Forums · General Discussion · Relative Average Oscillator << >>Post Follow-up
glider
59 posts
msg #39581
Ignore glider
12/15/2005 4:47:36 PM

Does anyone have a filter which mirrors Matthew Claassen's Relative Average Oscillator which was taken off this site about a year ago. Or if a filter already exitsts, point me in the right direction.

Thanks

Glider

BFreshour
139 posts
msg #39582
Ignore BFreshour
12/15/2005 6:28:33 PM

Why was it removed? There isn't much information on it available from the internet either... (at least not Google).

BFreshour
139 posts
msg #39584
Ignore BFreshour
12/15/2005 6:54:24 PM

Fetcher[set{RAV30A,close - ma(30)}
set{RAV30B,RAV30A / ma(30)}
set{RAV30C,RAV30B * 100}
set{RAV30D,sum(RAV30C,260)}
set{RAV30E,RAV30D / 260}
set{RAV30,RAV30C - RAV30E}

set{RAV50A,close - ma(50)}
set{RAV50B,RAV50A / ma(50)}
set{RAV50C,RAV50B * 100}
set{RAV50D,sum(RAV50C,260)}
set{RAV50E,RAV50D / 260}
set{RAV50,RAV50C - RAV50E}

set{RAV200A,close - ma(200)}
set{RAV200B,RAV200A / ma(200)}
set{RAV200C,RAV200B * 100}
set{RAV200D,sum(RAV200C,260)}
set{RAV200E,RAV200D / 260}
set{RAV200,RAV200C - RAV200E}

set{RAVHJA,RAV30+RAV50}
set{RAVHJ,RAVHJA+RAV200}

draw RAV30
draw RAVHJ
]

My interpretation of the article found here: http://www.shrewdinvesting.com/cat_content.asp?contentid=283&catid=136

I don't think it's correct. It seems like the values still need to be normalized between 2 numbers, eg 50, -50 for RAV30 and 150, -150 for RAVHJ

drew9
171 posts
msg #39589
Ignore drew9
12/15/2005 11:49:24 PM

BFreshour, thanks for your attempt at the RAV filter. I certainly hope you continue to work on this as I originally found RAV to be better than anything I have seen in the last year. Keep up the good work! Here is the announcement that was given about the topic:

"stockfetcher 11/29/2004 1:09:34 PM

Attention: Matthew Claassen's content is no longer available on StockFetcher. Matthew has closed TheTechicalView.net to work with an institutional research firm. Addtionally, proprietary measures developed and provided by Matthew Claassen are no longer available on StockFetcher.

Thank you,

StockFetcher.com Support
support@stockfetcher.com"

Regards,

Drew

 glider59 postsmsg #39590- Ignore glider 12/16/2005 1:20:32 AMBFreshour, Thanks for the effort to duplicate the RAV filter. I agree with drew9, it was one of the best around. Keep up the good work. glider
 StockFetcher Forums · General Discussion · Relative Average Oscillator << >>Post Follow-up

*** Disclaimer *** StockFetcher.com does not endorse or suggest any of the securities which are returned in any of the searches or filters. They are provided purely for informational and research purposes. StockFetcher.com does not recommend particular securities. StockFetcher.com, Vestyl Software, L.L.C. and involved content providers shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken based on the content.